I
work as a full-time Reception Technician at CSL Plasma. CSL Plasma is a
donating center where a person comes in to donate plasma, the essential clear
substance in your blood that contains protein and nutrients to help treat
diseases, and are compensated for their time. My duties include but are not
limited to: answering phones, checking vital signs, perform secretarial duties
such as data entry and making copies, as well as providing the best customer
service I can. I see different kinds of people every single day. There are
college students who come in as well as citizens of all ages within the city
and neighboring suburbs, all with various personalities, moods, and attitudes. Our
“clientele” is quite diverse as well. I would say that majority of our donors
are either Black or White with another large sum of people who identify as Native
American. Aside from the 40+ hours I spend there as a worker, I decided that it
would be great to take a seat in the lobby and watch others closely interact
with those around them.
I
wanted to be at my job on a day and at a time where I knew it was busier so I
could get the most observations possible. I decided to complete my observations
on Friday around 11:00 am and parked my behind on a chair to begin my day of
people watching. I started making a tally of how many people I witnessed either
waiting in line for their vital check, sitting in the lobby waiting for their
turn to donate. Some brought in a friend to wait with them as they donated, which
gave me an additional opportunity to watch how they might interact with someone
they’re more comfortable with. Right off the bat I noticed that many of the
donors I’d seen, no matter the ethnicity, were males. I've always slightly thought
that was possible. For my total time of 6 hours spent in the humid and
unsanitary lobby area, I counted 245 people, 189 of which were males. I've had
my own encounters with the males that made their way through the center. The
limited of time spent conversing with them an in enclosed space sometimes
involved inappropriate comments or phrases. They would refer to me as “beautiful,”
“gorgeous,” or “sexy” and I would feel very uncomfortable. Seeing them outside
of enclosed booth didn't matter at all because they called me the same names in
front of everyone else to hear. I discovered that I am not the only one who
gets complimented with such words. Plenty other females obtained pet names such
as “baby” or “sweetheart” by the older men while waiting for turn to donate. As
a woman would walk past with a slight twist of the hips, the male donors would
turn their heads to watch as they left the room. I for one was thoroughly
disgusted while watching the men do that. By the looks of the men that do come
in, I would guess that many of them are lonely or lack confidence which
ultimately results in them attempting to get with someone at the center. I
would assume that they are vulnerable beings and my workplace is not the
appropriate venue to pursue a relationship. In addition to the switching of the
hips, a few of the black women who were present during my observation wore
revealing shirts and pants that were low enough for men to see what color their
underwear was. That could’ve been possibly why the males called them such names
or wanted to give them sexual attention. Springer’s article stated that it’s
the nasty Jezebels who give black people a bad name. Those women are the ones
who prove to fit that stereotype. In all, I find there is a lack of respect
between men and women at my workplace.
In
regards to race, the black men seemed to be more straight forward and
aggressive in their approach with women. They were the only ones making such
remarks. In relation to gender, Hooks article states that, “In this book we
have been concerned about helping men to take responsibility for immature forms
of masculinity… it is clear that the world is overpopulated with not only immature men but also tyrannical
and abusive little girls pretending to be women…” After the denial of accepting
a phone number, one of the women were then cursed. This showed how immature the
man could be. In the case of ability, we have donors that are deemed “illiterate”
and are required to listen to a CD player loaded with important information. At
some point they skip a step to continue in the process with doesn't ever settle
well with all other donors. Because of their disability, the others around them
get angry and don’t understand that they have the same procedure but is done in
a separate way. On the day of my observations, I saw two donors become irate
because of our policy. In time they calmed down but they also did not fully
grasp why exactly their procedure differed.
Overall,
I thought it was great to sit down and watch the donors from a semi-alternate
perspective. I am hoping to possibly continue this so I can help put an end to
the disrespectful comments and attitudes brought into our positive environment.
I wonder why there are so many more men there than women. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that maybe women have more access to social service and support whereas men do not have as many options. I have no idea, just guessing. And I am assuming that people are there to earn extra money.
ReplyDeleteI think it is really telling how you describe the way some men were acting. If you change it around I think you would rarely hear women talking like that to men or asking for phone numbers and if women did a lot of assumptions would be made about them. I think it points to male privilege and I think that privilege can exist to some extent regardless of race. Women do not live in a society where they can get away saying certain things. I also think that the way the men acted after being turned down for a phone number is something a woman should not have to put up with. Again I think it points to male gender privilege: the woman can’t only say no but instead also has to listen to someone who is upset with her choice, a person she had not originally asked to engage with.